Installing multiple language packs for Office SharePoint Server 2007
Yes, I do some MOSS 2K7 stuff too. By default you MOSS install will come in English if like me you get the north American releases. But in world of multinational companies, displaying information in several languages is somehow a must!
Here is what you want to do to get MOSS to be multilingual.
First, you want to check that you meet the prerequisite: Additional Language File Support.
- On your front-end Web server, click Start, point to Settings and then Control Panel, and then click Regional and Language Options.
- In the Regional and Language Options dialog box, on the Languages tab, in the Supplemental Language Support section, select one or both of the following check boxes:
Install files for complex script and right-to-left languages
Install files for East Asian languages - Click OK in the dialog box that alerts you that additional disk space is required for the files.
- Click OK to install the additional language files.
- When prompted, insert your Windows Server 2003 product disc or provide the location of your Windows Server 2003 installation files.
- When prompted to restart your computer, click Yes.
Then you want to install the following components in the following order for each language:
(Use the change language drop down to choose different language’s language pack download)
- WSS Language pack (SharePointLanguagePack.exe)
- WSS Language pack SP1 (SharePoint.exe)
- MOSS Language pack ( extract *.IMG file)
- MOSS Language pack SP1 (officelp2007sp1-kb936982-fullfile-it-it.exe)
Warning and remarks! The only bad thing about all this is that you need to know all this before you start creating Site Collections because you can install new site in languages you later installed. I have learned that!
Also you may need to update WSS to SP1 prior going to step 2 as described in kb945967. Find it here.
The other bad thing about SharePoint is that you have to do the install on each "role" server of the farm. I wish there will be some central update managemet for SharePoint sometime soon!
Windows logon management
A while ago I posted a article about how Kerberos authentication worked and basically how you would determine who was using what account to log on which machine.
Not so long ago a colleague of mine, not to mention he is our HR head, found himself locked out while traveling to our Toronto office (he is based in Montreal). He found out as he was trying to log onto is laptop. After a call to the helpdesk he was able to log in as they unlocked his account, but the next morning he would be locked out again.
I'll let you check the Kerberos article to check how to find out the source of the lockout. Put shortly it is just matter of finding which Domain Controller his account was locked out on and then checking the security log to determine from what machine.
So it appeared that a week before traveling to Toronto, he had a training and he logged onto a training computer and got out of the training without logging off. And prior his travel he also changed his password. While a daily unlocking by the helpdesk helped him to achieve his daily work, the training machine where he was logged onto would try to authenticate at the DC (with a previously cached password) and lock him out.
This really demonstrates some issues of Windows Logon management (Active Directory based aka the ms windows directory service). And here I am thinking of logon/logoff control. It would have helped in this case to know where his account was currently logged to. If you wanted to do so you would have to collect logs of all workstations or other resource machines.
The Microsoft directory doesn't allow concurrent logon control. Well there are some tools given by Microsoft to manage this but so far my tries to make them work were unsuccessful (cconnect). Because when logging the directory only checks the validity of the logon, this doesn't allow to make any reporting of who is logged where and for how long. This limits somehow your (system admins) ability to control credential sharing issues or just to enforce accountability for users action on different machines.
Those are not the only lacks of the Windows directory. Along with the lack of logon/logoff reporting, there is no session control on workstation. Of course as an Domain Admin you can log off someone but this is a tedious task if you had to logoff 100 users for security reasons. A little logon session monitoring would be helpful as for now you would have to check open session on several servers to do so and DCs do not keep track of current logon sessions anyway.
With that we can also talk about the fact that there is no automated way to logoff users on unattended workstations. And without saying anything about the fact that it is good to free up resources I see it as a threat as a terminated users that left his workstation locked would be able to unlock it - even if this user account is now gone from AD or just disabled.
The only manageable part of logon with Windows directory is time of logon and and workstations logon permission. However this is only feasible by user only. This doesn't make management easy and it would be interesting to be able to control those restriction per groups.
Yet, Windows Directory is pretty comfortable to manange and use but it could use some more logon controlling to enforce more security and control over users/hackers attempts/mistakes with logon.
Note: I have limited hands on windows 2008 servers but I don't remember seeing too much changes as far as logon control goes. Please feel free to update!
New 70-620
Today after a half day study about the now-not-so-new OS from the all mighty corporation Microsoft, I decided to write my exam for Vista more precisely: 70-620: Configure and Install Vista.
Well I don't think it is a hard exam according to the study material I have, a bit of hands on should do the trick. So initial after a short period of study time I register for the exam that should take 2h30 and now it looks like this very same exam I studied for it now 4h!
How come an exam like that change from 2 to 4h in length? as said earlier it seems that the all mighty do whatever they want MSFT corp changed the exam. So I imagine plenty of scenarios of what they could have change from the current syllabus and how they might have made this exams tougher.
Indeed, it is longer (4h) and has more questions (64 vs 40) but as it is new and that MSFT uses Prometric to administrate exams, there are some glitches. All the active exhibit and probably other nice feature do not work.
Help Help - unknow file type and others errors when trying to open the exhibits necessary to answer the question #1. Prometric personal on this center on alert, but for now i am just waiting.
Waiting for hours (yes, hours; 2) for them to find out that it cannot be fixed fast and that it is a global issue, they messed the programing to support the brand new MSFT exam...eventhough they just pass the ball around to MSFT and then MSFT does the same. Who's fault is it, I would say Prometric but they say it is MSFT.
So I am not even able to tell what changed from the previous version I have heard of and this one, I never was able to even read the first full question!
Nonetheless, I waste an afternoon and I have achieve nothing but emptiness. What is next? A voucher to take this exam later. To be frank they offered me to write the exam tomorrow but I guess I will wait for all the glitches to disappear and take this exam, new longer tougher 70-620
Outlook Fix: Attach Zip Files to Outgoing E-Mail
I was chatting with an employee at our company about emails and document management and he asked me about a strange thing happening on his MSFT Outlook 2003. When browsing for a zip file to put as attachment, Outlook would not display zip files.
It turns out this is a known bug.
Fortunately, there are two easy workarounds. First, you can manually open the folder containing the Zip file, then drag it to the new e-mail window. That accomplishes the same thing as selecting a file with the attach tool. Second, you can do the following:
- In Windows XP, click Start > Run, then type Command and hit Enter. In Vista, click Start, type Command and hit Enter.
- Type regsvr32 /u zipfldr.dll
- Wait for a confirmation box to appear. Click OK, then type Exit into the Command window to close it.
Windows has a system component that treats zip files like ordinary file folders and Outlook sees these files as folders. In most cases, it only happens when you don't have third party compression programs installed, so you may see the behavior on one system but not another.
DFS targeting error
I have encountered an interesting follow up about a file and print server outage last week.
We do have a DFS namespace with 2 targets, one in Toronto, one in Montreal.
The DFS target is set on users belonging to the group “DropBox” by a vbs script that adds a link to the DFS referral.
Because DFS is set to select the target based on site costing, Montreal people will be set with the Montreal File&Print(FNP) and Toronto will be set with the Toronto FNP.
Where ever users are a DropBox is always accessible. Documents will be store on the FNP for imaging scans.
As the Montreal FNP became unavailable last week, DFS switched clients targeting to make the active target as Toronto FNP.
This would cause Montreal documents to go in the English queue of Toronto.
DFS is not clever enough to failover back to the original.
So I had to use dfsutil to revert back to normal. Dfsutil is available in the winXP support tools.
Note: Erasing the link and having the script recreating it will not change the targeting,
C:\>dfsutil /pktflush
EntryPath=[*]
Done processing this command.
C:\>dfsutil /spcflush
EntryPath=[*]
Done processing this command.
Clearing the cache will cause the client to recheck site costing to find the nearest DFS referral. And voila, all clients are pointing to the right referral server after a little script ran on all the PCs.
So once my problem was cleared I thought I could check that little tool more in depth. And I think checking the MSFT example website is a good ide - here.
KitKatNeko